Korach Was Not the Thomas Jefferson of his Time:
Standing Up for Equality Versus Unearned Holiness
By BRENT CHAIM SPODEK
Parashat Korach (Numbers 16:1-18:32)
Despite their many flaws, the Founding Fathers are generally
considered heroes by most Americans. They are justly honored for producing what
remains a cornerstone of contemporary human rights:
We hold these Truths to be
self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed, by their
Creator, with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty,
and the Pursuit of Happiness.
Just as the leaders of the American Revolution imagined a
political future different from the one in which they lived, so too does
Korach, the leader of one of the many rebellions in Parashat Korach.
Chafing under Moses’ leadership, Korach gathers 250 prominent Israelites and
says that Moses and the kohanim have done too much to raise themselves
above the other members of the community, all of whom are holy. Just as the
American Revolutionaries denied the right of England’s King George III to rule
them, so too do Korach and his followers deny the right of Moses to lead them.
But while the American Revolution as embodied in the
Declaration of Independence has endured to celebrate its 230th anniversary this
coming Tuesday, Korach’s rebellion was over before it began. The parashah
opens with Korach and his fellows rising up against Moses, and before the parashah
ends, they have been swallowed up into the bowels of the earth.
Why should two seemingly similar egalitarian revolutions
meet such different ends? Why should American Jews curse one set of rebels, and
then three days later celebrate the other?
Given the tremendous differences in the historical
circumstances of the two rebellions, it’s remarkable that their claims are as
similar as they are. But these claims are not identical. Thomas Jefferson says
that all men are created equal, while Korach claims that the community
is holy. Jefferson speaks of our origins relative to each other; Korach
speaks of where we currently stand in an absolute sense.
Jefferson articulates humanity’s common origin and says that
the role of government is to make that equality manifest. The aspirations which
fueled the American Revolution continue to drive America at its finest moments,
when it honestly and justly seeks more liberty for more people.
The Revolutionary War ended with the Treaty of Paris, but
the Revolution kept going. It ran through the Emancipation Proclamation which
freed almost all American slaves in 1863 and through 1920 when the 19th
Amendment to the Constitution gave American women the right to vote. The
Revolution ran through the 1965 Voting Rights Act which finally harnessed the
power of federal law to enshrine the “self-evident” right of African Americans
to vote.
In contrast to the aspirational character of the American
Revolution, Korach simply announces that the people are, at the moment he is
speaking, holy. With a voice of complacent nihilism, Korach essentially claims
that there is nowhere left to go—the people are already holy. While Thomas
Jefferson and his contemporaries spoke hopefully of who Americans might be,
Korach spoke erroneously about who the Israelites were.
But the people weren’t holy—not at that point, anyway. God
told the Israelites that they had the potential to become a nation of
priests and a holy people, but they weren’t there yet. The promise of holiness
was conditional—if you keep my covenant, then you will be a holy
people. (Exodus 19:6)
Korach’s sin was his complacency—it was as if he said, “We
don’t need any leaders because we don’t have any goals toward which we can be
led.” He had no vision of the Jewish people being greater than they were—only
of him being their leader.*
His complacency is one of the most egregious heresies a Jew can
commit. For Korach to say that Jews were holy was to say they had no higher
level to reach. For a people who were born slaves and were now free, complacent
acceptance of the world as it is was apostasy of the worst kind.
Although the dream of the Declaration of Independence is far
from realized, the American Revolution—not only the Revolutionary War, but the
ongoing revolutions which strive to make our society more egalitarian—aspires
to bring us ever closer to a world in which the essential equality of all
people is manifest and protected.
Korach’s mistake wasn’t in thinking that we were all equal,
but that we are all holy. One who thinks she grasps holiness most certainly
doesn’t. One day, God willing, we will all merit to be called holy. But until
then, holiness is a beacon, not a prize.
* There is a great deal of uncertainty as to exactly why
Korach rebelled. Some, like Michael Walzer, say that he was primarily a social
and economic rebel. Other voices in the rabbinic tradition say he was
expressing dissatisfaction with the restrictions of the mitzvot. Rashi,
citing the Tanhuma, explains that Korach’s primary concern was not
substantive change, but his own glory. See Michael Walzer, Exodus and
Revolution (New York: Basic Books, 1985), pp.111-112, the comments attributed
to On’s wife at Sanhedrin 109b and Rashi’s comment at Numbers 16:1.
Reprinted with permission from American
Jewish World Service.